Smart Contract Security Audits for DeFi & Web3
We combine deep EVM expertise with competitive security research experience to help Web3 projects identify critical risks before they become real-world exploits.
We combine deep EVM expertise with competitive security research experience to help Web3 projects identify critical risks before they become real-world exploits.
We provide comprehensive security services to help Web3 protocols identify vulnerabilities, reduce risks, and build secure decentralized applications.
Our researchers perform deep manual reviews of Solidity and EVM-based smart contracts, identifying vulnerabilities in logic, access control, and protocol design
We design and build secure Solidity and EVM-based smart contracts from the ground up, following security best practices and delivering audit-ready, well-tested code.
Beyond code review, we evaluate protocol incentives and economic models to identify risks such as oracle manipulation, price attacks, and accounting vulnerabilities.
We provide comprehensive security assessments for blockchain protocols, covering architecture, integrations, upgrade mechanisms, and critical trust assumptions.
Our team conducts independent security research and vulnerability discovery, helping projects understand emerging threats in the Web3 ecosystem
We help early-stage projects identify critical security issues before deployment, protecting user funds and building confidence with the community.
A wrapped recovery deadline and a replayable signed payload cost an Argent-style smart wallet system about $59.8K on Ethereum. How it worked and how to fix it.
A vault that lets callers pass in their own contract addresses and then books whatever those contracts return is a drain waiting to happen. Here is how this smart contract vulnerability works, why decompiled bytecode still gives it away in minutes, and the checklist PandaSecurity uses when auditing accounting logic.
A recovery bot finalized stale Sui Bridge withdrawals and paid 86 ETH, 109K USDT and 0.9 WBTC to the Cetus exploiter. What went wrong and what to fix.
How a permissionless accept() and a buyback with no slippage limit let an attacker drain 2.31 ETH from the KolanHook Uniswap v4 hook on Ethereum.
UNCX's token vesting contract lost roughly $87.7K when an attacker exploited a share-accounting flaw in release(), topUpVesting(), and cancel(). We break down the root cause, the exact attack sequence, and what builders should take away from it — without the jargon.
Autheo’s THEO token lost 92% after attackers used a Hyperlane TrustedRelayerIsm misconfiguration to mint 19 million unbacked tokens on Base and extract roughly $1.76 million. Here’s how the attack worked and why single-key security models remain dangerous for cross-chain assets.
Uniswap v4 hooks explained: the PoolManager singleton, flash accounting, and what the Cork and Bunni exploits teach us about hook security. A PandaSecurity deep dive.
An attacker forced a Uniswap V4 vault into a zero-liquidity state, redeemed one minimal share unit, and withdrew roughly 14,838.47 DAI. Panda Security breaks down the transaction, vulnerable code, root cause, and practical fixes.
Advanced smart contract audits and security research to help blockchain projects identify vulnerabilities and protect user assets.